After my
last post, someone (and I will not name him/her because he/she is employed in a
field where he/she must get these things right or else there would be dire
consequences for him/her and he/she might be out of a job) sent me an email:
‘Afro-Caribbean’
in your last blog is very non-PC now!
I replied
to him/her:
I
can't think of any PC term to describe someone whose origins are from Africa
via the Caribbean. What is it?
He/she
wrote:
Nowadays
we refer to these groups as Black African or Black Caribbean.
And to
that I replied:
Why?
In Cayman there are black people whose origins lie in Africa, South America and
South East Asia. If they are all Black Caribbean, it's a nonsense
and misleading.
PC
is bollocks!
Maybe it’s
an age thing. Does political correctness come more easily to those who
were born after a certain date? I often seem to get it wrong and
consequently, whenever I come across it and do get it wrong, I tend to think
that political correctness is bollocks.
John Cleese, the
actor/comedian, is older than me and he finds it difficult:
“It
starts out as a half way decent idea and then it goes completely wrong.”
My problems
probably began when I was 5 years old when I saw a Black man for the first
time. My Infant school had visitors from Nigeria.
In 1952,
teachers never needed to worry about political correctness but they did know
what was polite.
“Don’t stare
and don’t call them black,” we were told.
“That’s
rude. They’re coloured.”
Describe
someone as ‘coloured’ nowadays and all hell is let loose. But to talk
about ‘a man or woman of colour’ as Viola Davis did in her Emmy award
acceptance speech a couple of weeks ago, is PC and acceptable.
I don’t
get it.
Classifying
someone by their appearance can rarely be PC and can lead to all kinds of
problems and anomalies. A friend in Cayman, who in the UK would be
described as Afro-Caribbean, went to work in the US where he was designated as
‘African-American’. He was somewhat annoyed because, as he said, “I’m
neither African nor American.”
When I was
young, the peoples living in the Arctic region of Siberia, North America
and Greenland and who existed by nomadic hunting, were known as Eskimos.
However, ‘Eskimo’ is now considered as pejorative and a non-PC term. Only
‘Inuit’ is PC and acceptable and is in common usage there, here and
everywhere.
But
‘Inuit’ is just one of the tribes not all of them - the Yupik, Inupiat, Aleut,
Kalaallit, Naukan, Alutiiq and
the Inuit - and it is certainly not a descriptor accepted by the Yupik tribe.
Consequently,
‘Eskimo’ is the only generic term that encompasses all the relevant
tribes, but to use it is very non-PC.
I don’t
get that either.
The United
States Government has a department called the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
It does not have Bureaus of Chinese, German or Russian Affairs. The
Indian Affairs Bureau never has dealings with the country of India or the
Indian government but is in fact responsible for the welfare of the American
Indians.
Yet, there
are no American Indians any more. Those people are correctly known
nowadays as Native Americans or Amerindians. Those are the PC terms and
don’t you dare call them Indians!
Unfortunately,
nobody seems to have bothered to tell the Indians – sorry, Native
Americans. When my sister-in-law and her family were taken on a tour of
a Cahuilla Indian reservation
in southern California in March this year, their Amerindian guide always referred to his people and ancestors as ‘Indians’.
I am not
even going to start to try to attempt to explain why it is all right for a
Black man to refer to another Black man as a ‘nigger’ but that is the worst
possible word that a White person can ever utter – worse even than that word
that rhymes with punt.
In a
tangentially similar vein, and this has bothered me for more than 40 years, how
did it come about and happen that ‘Paki’ is extremely racist and non-PC, while
calling an Australian an ‘Aussie’ is almost a term of affection? Maybe the hard ‘k’ makes it sound aggressive
and threatening.
It’s some
people’s reaction to a breach of PC etiquette that really pisses me off.
I can still remember the haranguing I received from a feminazi* on the staff of
the school where I taught, when I referred to a 23 year-old teacher as, “that girl
in the art department.”
I was 50
years old at the time and to me, that art teacher was a girl. I am not
saying that I was right and the harridan was wrong. Technically, she was
correct, I suppose but the venom, volume and vehemence of her admonishment was
absurd and way out of proportion to the supposed offence - in my opinion.
In 2004,
it was reported that staff at the coffee shop in the Mitchell Library in
Glasgow refused to serve a customer who had ordered a ‘black coffee’, because
it was a racist phrase. He would only get it if he asked for “coffee
without milk”. Apparently, a member of staff was offended by hearing
“black” coffee.
I don’t
know what that affronted barista would have thought of a coffee drinker in
Alderley Edge some years ago. As a student during a summer vacation,
Caroline, my wife, worked in a coffee shop. A regular customer when asked how he
liked his coffee would always say, “I want it the colour of Shirley Bassey.”
In New
York recently, as a result of allegations of racism over the use of non-PC
‘yellowface’ make-up so that white actors appear Japanese, a production of The
Mikado by the New York Gilbert & Sullivan Players has been cancelled and
replaced by The Pirates of Penzance. I hope that they can find genuine
Cornish actors to play the pirates!
Does that mean
that the only productions of The Mikado that White British actors may take part
in from now on will have to be like the 1987 production that set the action in
an Edwardian country hotel with all the actors appearing in English
costume?
Will it ever be
politically correct again for an actor to ‘black up’ to play Othello or for a
gentile to play Shylock?
Will a
white impressionist ever again be allowed to impersonate a black celebrity’s
voice and accent?
Student Unions sometimes seem to blur the PC line. In May this year, a ‘Diversity Officer’ at
Goldsmiths College, University of London banned all men and white women from a
meeting of ethnic minority women. Imagine
the furore if ethnic minority women were banned from meetings of white people.
This week, The Students’ Union
at the University of East Anglia has banned students from wearing sombreros on
campus. These straw hats were
distributed as part of an advertising campaign by a Tex-Mex restaurant in
Norwich. Apparently, the sombreros were
symbols of ‘cultural appropriation', whatever the hell that means!
I suppose that next St
Patrick’s Day, the students at UEA will be barred from drinking Guinness.
Thank God that kind of attitude didn’t prevail when I was a
student.
Definition of ‘Offence’
Annoyance or resentment brought about by a
perceived insult to or disregard for oneself.
Some
people are just too thin skinned. I have sometimes experienced annoyance
by what someone has said to me but I have never felt resentment. Just
because someone is annoyed can hardly be taken to mean that they are
offended. Consequently, I don’t think I’ve ever been offended in my life
and I have had opportunities.
In 1975,
when I was the only white person queuing at a beach bar in Tobago, one barman
told the other barman to, “serve the honky.”
I was
surprised and I assumed that it showed how the barman felt about me but I
wasn’t offended because he didn’t know me and he had no evidence with which to
vilify me. I just shrugged it off and let it pass.
So, to those of
you who have tried to offend me in the past, I regret to inform you that I
wasn’t. You will just have to try a lot harder in future -
but if anything I’ve written here has offended you, I’m sorry.
It wasn’t
intentional.
* Nine years later we were married.
** It is just possible that
you may not have come across this word before. ‘Honky’ is a contemptuous
term used to refer to a white person. Black Power militants who were
looking for a rebuttal for the word ‘nigger’ adopted ‘honky’ as an
uncomplimentary, derogatory term in 1967. Its etymology is uncertain.
When I was referred to as a honky in Tobago, a Trinidadian told me that
its origin lay in the fact that a white person’s skin is the colour of a pig’s
and ‘honky’ is based on the sound made by pigs.
I have
found at least three other theories as to its origins but none that mentions
pigs. There seems to be no definitive explanation.
No comments:
Post a Comment